Also, the IS-2 tanks had to fight against the German heavy tanks "Tiger I" and "Tiger II", with which the lighter Soviet tank could fight on equal terms. The IS-2 was used in almost all military Jumbo got .50cals for anti light tank use and against planes as well as a short stabilizer. Armour is okish and it's excellent in downtiers. Tiger 2 has a better gun but also a much, much softer turret, no 0.50s against flanking light tanks and planes and no stabilizer, and pretty much no lineup at 6.3 The German military developed the Jagdtiger to destroy Allied tanks, such as the American M4 Sherman. (Photo Credit: Joost J. Bakker / Wikimedia Commons CC BY 2.0) Tanks were an integral part to the war strategy of both sides during World War II. Therefore, it was important to the Germans that they be equipped with a destroyer that could defeat (British Matilda, French Char-BIs, German tiger, Russian KV series tanks, and the American Sherman were all heavily armoured/sloped enough to shrug off light AT fire. The Italians were the only superpower to not have a main battle tank capable of shrugging off smaller shells, and that is largely because the majority of their armour was designed Back to the Russian Front with 'WWII Battle Tanks - T-34 vs Tiger'! The year 2008 was a promising one for tank simulation enthusiasts, with two new WW2 tank sims released around the same time. One was Steel Fury - Kharkov 1942, which found most favour with players, continues to be modded and played, and has been featured in three recent mi The is3 is a straight better tank than the obsolete and rather pointless tiger 2. A mid range heavy sniper with no dpm is called a bad tank. Of course you can play second line support and side scrape with the tiger 2 but all of those roles are simply less useful than the is3s out trading and mobility capabilities. p3B0bqX. Nazi Germany's Tiger is arguably the most famous tank of World War II. With its thick armor and devastating 88-millimeter gun, the Mark VI—or Tiger I —soon earned a devastating reputation on The top ten tanks today are the German KF51 Panther, the American Abrams M1A2, the Russian T-14 Armata, the Korean K2 Black Panther, the Chinese T-99, the German Leopard 2, the French Leclerc XL, the British Challenger 2, the Israeli Merkava V, and the Japanese Type-90. Each tank is competing for superior firepower, mobility, and strength, but The M26 was the culmination of a series of medium tank prototypes that began with the T20 in 1942, and it was a significant design departure from the previous line of U.S. Army tanks that had ended with the M4 Sherman. Several design features were tested in the prototypes. Some of these were experimental dead-ends, but many became permanent There's two ways to tackle this question. First being how effective were the Tigers were on a tactical level, as in how effective was it at breaking Allied positions/destroying Allied armor/defending a position that is under attack. The second is how effective was it at the strategic level, as in how did Tigers contribute in the grand scale of VK100 is a tankier with less weakspot with more punchier gun compare to tiger P. Peak of maus line VK45 is a more mobile evolution, basically a more mobile Tiger II with worse lower plate armor and gun depression, have same super consumables as Tiger P, also share all of it gun with Tiger II. The CM-11 "Brave Tiger" of the Taiwanese Army was born through a 1990 initiative seeking to upgrade its armored corps through a M48A2 turret and newer M60 Patton MBT hull. The turret fitted a 105mm main gun, an advanced Fire Control System, stabilized sights, ballistics computer and thermal imaging. Through this process, the tank was put on par

is 2 tank vs tiger